updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/aonyeani76/cryptocurrencypanther/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131hustle domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/aonyeani76/cryptocurrencypanther/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131wpforms-lite domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/aonyeani76/cryptocurrencypanther/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Despite Bitcoin’s inception over a decade ago with Satoshi Nakamoto’s vision of facilitating peer-to-peer electronic cash transactions, its current usage mirrors its early days. The Bitcoin (BTC) transactions are circulating at a pace reminiscent of 13 years ago. This revelation comes from CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju, who highlighted the stagnation in Bitcoin’s velocity.
Ju noted that the trend indicates a shift towards the digital gold narrative rather than widespread adoption for daily transactions. The concept of Bitcoin as “Digital Gold” has gained traction. Hence, institutions are increasingly holding onto the cryptocurrency as a store of value rather than utilizing it for frequent transactions.

The velocity of Bitcoin transactions, depicted in a chart shared by Ki Young Ju, stands at a level similar to that of 2011. This reflects a long-standing trend of sluggish movement in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Though the Bitcoin velocity spiked several times in these 13 years, it’s now back to the 2011 levels, according to CryptoQuant.
Nick Tomaino, a former Coinbase executive, recalled the early days of Bitcoin adoption. He noted that Coinbase initially raised significant funding under the premise that Bitcoin would revolutionize payments and spur the creation of new applications. However, the reality differed as the platform onboarded merchants like Overstock to accept Bitcoin, but the long-term viability of Bitcoin payments proved elusive.
Tomaino’s insights shed light on the challenges faced by Bitcoin as a payment method. It also emphasizes the lack of a compelling business case for Bitcoin payments in the face of emerging alternatives like Ethereum and decentralized applications. Moreover, he highlighted how Ethereum’s inception changed the entire crypto payments game.
Also Read: Bitcoin Notes $2B Inflows But Ethereum Steals The Spotlight, Here’s Why
Zach Rynes, a Chainlink community liaison, delved deeper into the technical limitations of Bitcoin for payments. He particularly highlighted Bitcoin’s lack of programmability compared to Ethereum and other blockchain platforms. Rynes highlighted two crucial issues: volatility risk and payment accuracy, both of which are critical for merchants considering cryptocurrency payments.
Rynes explained that smart contract capabilities of Ethereum allow for seamless conversion of crypto assets into stablecoins. Hence, it mitigates volatility concerns for merchants. Additionally, Ethereum’s programmability enables automatic validation of payment amounts. This reduces the burden of manual reconciliation for incorrect payments.
In contrast, Bitcoin’s UTXO-based architecture presents hurdles for implementing similar functionalities directly on its blockchain. While Lightning Network offers potential solutions for validation issues, challenges persist in managing liquidity and scalability. This limits its effectiveness in addressing Bitcoin’s payment shortcomings.
Furthermore, Rynes’ analysis underscores the complexity of Bitcoin payments. It also emphasizes the necessity for pragmatic solutions to accommodate merchant requirements while maintaining decentralization and non-custodial principles.
Despite the backlash from Bitcoin maximalists, Rynes maintains that acknowledging Bitcoin’s limitations in payment processing is essential for driving innovation. However, Bitcoin maximalists also see a hope in the rise of BTC payments as the Layer 2 network is making great progress toward the target. Nonetheless, Layer 1 BTC payments might not go mainstream anytime soon.
Also Read: How Bitcoin Will Benefit From End Of US-Saudi Petrodollar Deal
The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
The Crypto market has been fluctuating heavily in the past couple of weeks but with last week’s rally had finally landed into the greed territory. However, as the rally had slowed down and the inevitable market correction had begun, sentiment had begun to shift once again into the negative. This had caused the Fear & Greed Index to reverse out of the greed territory, finally ending in neutral. Now, the market remains at a standstill waiting for the next move.
The crypto Fear & Greed Index helps map out how investors are feeling towards the market. Currently, it is neither good nor bad which has seen the index languishing in neutral territory. It is important to note that sentiment had driven far into greed as bitcoin had made its way to $47,000 but now, most of that positive sentiment seems to have washed away after bitcoin had made a slight decline that brought it back into the $46,000 region.
Related Reading | Dogecoin Soared After Elon Musk Bought 9.2% Of Twitter, What’s Next?
With bitcoin’s decline, the whole market had naturally taken a tumble along with it. This inevitably brought down the total market cap back into the low $2 trillion. Nevertheless, the market has begun to recover once more, which would explain why the index did not completely slip into the fear region.

Last week, the index had finished in greed, a stark contrast to the extreme fear in which the index had closed the previous month. The current location of the index at a neutral 52 suggests that investors are not making any important moves in the market. Mostly, the buys and sells have been balancing out each other and investors are not moving either way at present.
Related Reading | Bitcoin Exchange Outflows Suggest Rally May Only Be Starting
This is easily understandable given that the market had mostly slowed to a crawl in terms of momentum. Top cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum continue to trend in the same region, struggling to make it above the next significant resistance points. While the rest of the market waits to follow what the market leaders do.
However, since the majority of the market continues to trade in the green, the Fear & Greed is skewed towards greed despite being in the neutral territory. With what looks like another bounce-off point for the crypto market, the index may very well be back in greed before the week runs out.
Market cap at $2.098 trillion | Source: Crypto Total Market Cap on TradingView.com
Featured image from Stears Business, chart from TradingView.com
✓ Share: